Get Smart: Call It Spypunk?
Posted in Media on June 30th, 2008
I recently saw the new Get Smart movie. On its own, it was amusing, but more than that it made me a bit nostalgic for the original TV show. Watching Max answer his shoe phone, I began thinking about how the ridiculous technology of the spy genre seems like a natural progression from the dieselpunk era.
I mentioned this to my friend Xandra and she suggested we call it spypunk.
So how would I define this theoretical spypunk genre? It shares the penchant for gadgetry that the other punks show, in this case focusing on small gadgets that mimic harmless items. Rather than dieselpunk’s usual Nazi enemies, the Cold War is all the rage, and thus there is some obvious overlap with what has been named atomicpunk.
The key difference, in my mind, is that spypunk focuses on the efforts of individuals, almost like a throwback to the Victorian era’s detectives and gentlemen adventurers. Both era’s heroes work on their own, but often in concert with a greater organization and have a patriotism that is often lacking in dieselpunk outside of the narrow WWII window.
As examples of the genre, I would cite the aforementioned Get Smart, the ubiquitous James Bond in virtually all of his iterations, and the classic Avengers series out of Britain. Austin Powers might also fit snugly in this genre. What do you think?

Tatting lace is not a craft I’ve seen much lately. How did you become interested in it?
In the early part of the 20th century, many people in both Europe and America became quite fascinated with the Mysterious East. While treatment of those actually from the mysterious east was rather wretched, the both easterners and westerners were happy to borrow superficial details from each other’s culture, and this is well-reflected in late Victorian and Edwardian fashion. Whether you’re actually Asian and want to dress the part or you want to play a proto-otaku, there’s plenty of historical precedent for mixing up western and eastern dress.