Get Smart: Call It Spypunk?

I recently saw the new Get Smart movie. On its own, it was amusing, but more than that it made me a bit nostalgic for the original TV show. Watching Max answer his shoe phone, I began thinking about how the ridiculous technology of the spy genre seems like a natural progression from the dieselpunk era.

I mentioned this to my friend Xandra and she suggested we call it spypunk.

So how would I define this theoretical spypunk genre? It shares the penchant for gadgetry that the other punks show, in this case focusing on small gadgets that mimic harmless items. Rather than dieselpunk’s usual Nazi enemies, the Cold War is all the rage, and thus there is some obvious overlap with what has been named atomicpunk.

The key difference, in my mind, is that spypunk focuses on the efforts of individuals, almost like a throwback to the Victorian era’s detectives and gentlemen adventurers. Both era’s heroes work on their own, but often in concert with a greater organization and have a patriotism that is often lacking in dieselpunk outside of the narrow WWII window.

As examples of the genre, I would cite the aforementioned Get Smart, the ubiquitous James Bond in virtually all of his iterations, and the classic Avengers series out of Britain. Austin Powers might also fit snugly in this genre. What do you think?

4 Responses to “Get Smart: Call It Spypunk?”

  1. Ottens Says:

    “Spypunk” may be a charming little invention, though I don’t see that much differences with what has been labeled “Atomicpunk”. Perhaps atomicpunk is more like dieselpunk, and spypunk more like steampunk in terms of the characters which it features. Still, it seems very James Bondesque/Pulp, and I’m not sure whether it should be a genre in its own right. That doesn’t mean we shouldn’t keep using the term, though! Just another good way to refer to a specific kind of fiction we like! (And I would include Austin Powers in this!)

  2. Cendri Says:

    It makes me think of this TV trope. XD

  3. Micah Says:

    I’ve brought up the term Atomicpunk on the Steampunk Facebook group a number of times, but I really think “Spypunk” is much too specific. I mean, it’s alright to make up new -punks, but I believe it should relate to a specific time/event period, not a movement within said time/event. In this way, I suppose I don’t recognize “Biopunk” “Eamespunk” “Modpunk” because they seem to use the -punk as a catch-all, and the more specific genres use this catch-all, the less significance the pillars (clock-, steam-, diesel- and cyberpunk) will carry in general.

  4. Micah Says:

    Oh, I consider Atomicpunk a pillar as well…

Leave a Reply